After the NYC Council voted to override a veto by former Mayor Eric Adams, New York City will soon require large employers to report pay data by employee race, ethnicity, and gender.

NYC Pay Data Reporting Coverage and Requirements

As we previously reported, while these new requirement take effect immediately, covered employers—i.e., employers with 200 or more employees in New York City (including full-time, part-time and temporary employees)—will have some breathing room, as the City must first implement the process for the submission of such information.

First, the law requires that an agency be designated within one year of the law taking effect (i.e., by December 4, 2026), at which point the designated agency has one year to develop a standardized fillable form for covered employers to submit pay reports. 

Within one year of the designated agency publishing the standardized form, and annually thereafter, covered employers must submit to the designated agency:

  • A pay report that includes current information corresponding with the categories of information required by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in the EEO-1 “Component 2” reporting requirements for reporting years 2017 and 2018; and
  • A separate signed statement confirming the submission and accuracy of the pay report. 

As noted above, the NYC pay report will track pay data information that private sector employers with 100 or more employees, as well as certain federal contractors/subcontractors, were previously required to compile and submit to the EEOC as part of annual EEO-1 reporting requirements for years 2017 and 2018.  This information included aggregate pay and hours-worked data across 12 pay bands broken out by job category and by race, ethnicity, and sex. 

Component 2 pay data reporting has not been required as part of annual EEO-1 reporting since 2020, when collection of the 2018 data closed and the EEOC published a Federal Register notice reflecting it could not seek approval to continue Component 2 reporting.  As such, the NYC law will effectively reinstate an obligation for those employers covered by the City law that has not existed for several years.  It is further noted that the designated agency would be authorized to adopt modifications for the NYC pay report, which could include (but would not be limited to) inclusion of reporting options accounting for different gender identities beyond male and female.  

How Pay Data Will be Compiled and Used   

While employers will have an option to submit the pay report anonymously, the separate signed statement must identify the employer.  Within one year after covered employers submit their pay reports, and annually thereafter, the designated agency will conduct a pay equity study and publish the data contained in the reports in the aggregate, and in a manner that does not reveal a covered employers’ or employee’s identifying information. 

Penalties for Noncompliance

Violations of the law will subject employers to civil penalties, as follows:

  • For the first offense, a covered employer will be subject to a written warning if the employer provides, within 30 days of the service of summons, documentation indicating that such violation has been cured. If the employer fails to provide such documentation, they will be subject to a civil penalty of $1,000; and
  • For any subsequent offense, a covered employer will be subject to a civil penalty of $5,000.

The designated agency will also publish annually on its website a list of covered employers that fail to comply with the reporting requirements.

Other Pay Data Reporting Laws and Pending Bills

With the enactment of this new requirement, NYC will join a small—but potentially expanding—group of jurisdictions requiring employer pay data reporting. 

California has required private employers with 100+ employees in total (and at least one employee in CA) to submit annual workforce pay and demographic data reporting to he California Civil Rights Department since March 2021 (with certain modifications over time).  Reports are organized by establishment and include breakdowns by job category, pay band, race, ethnicity, and sex, along with hours worked.  Employers face per-employee civil penalties for non-compliance. 

Illinois began requiring private businesses with more than 100 employees in Illinois to obtain an Equal Pay Registration Certification, with the first certificate having been required by March 23, 2024 and continuing every two years thereafter.  To obtain a certificate, employers must submit certain information to the Illinois Department of Labor, including (i) the employer’s most recently filed EEO-1 report; (ii) a list of employees separated by gender, race, and ethnicity with employee-level data including county, dates of employment, and total wages; and (iii) a signed compliance statement meeting certain specifications.     

And in a related requirement, effective as of February 2025, Massachusetts employers with 100+ employees in MA are required to annually submit to the MA state secretary copies of their EEO-1 report as submitted to the EEOC.  Employers covered by the EEOC’s EEO-3 (covering local referral unions), EEO-4 (covering state and local governments), and/or EEO-5 (covering public elementary and secondary school systems) reporting requirements are also required to submit to the MA state secretary copies of such reports on a biannual basis.     

Looking ahead, the New York state legislature is currently considering a bill that would require employers bidding on state contracts to annually submit employee pay data broken down by job category, gender, race, and ethnicity, as well as the difference between pay averages in each category, to the New York State Comptroller.   

*          *          *

We will continue to monitor and report developments relating to this and similar pay data reporting laws.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Evandro Gigante Evandro Gigante

Evandro is the go-to employment litigator and counselor when clients face their most challenging, bet the reputation claims, or want to develop policies and practices that mitigate legal risk. As an award-winning partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department, member of the…

Evandro is the go-to employment litigator and counselor when clients face their most challenging, bet the reputation claims, or want to develop policies and practices that mitigate legal risk. As an award-winning partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department, member of the Employment Litigation group, and co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity group, he represents clients on a variety of labor and employment matters, including allegations of sexual harassment, race, gender, national origin, disability and religious discrimination. In addition, Evandro handles restrictive covenant matters, including non-compete, non-solicitation and trade secret disputes. Evandro also counsels employers through the most sensitive employment issues, including matters involving employer diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

With a focus on discrimination and harassment claims, Evandro has extensive experience defending clients before federal and state courts. He tries cases before juries and arbitrators and routinely represents clients before administrative agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, as well as state and local human rights commissions. Evandro often draws on his extensive litigation experience to help clients avoid the courtroom by effectuating positive change in the workplace through impactful anti-discrimination and harassment training, as well as robust employment policies.

Working in a wide range of industries, Evandro has experience representing clients in professional services, including law firms, financial services, including private equity and hedge funds, higher education, sports, media, retail, and others. Evandro also advises charter schools and other not-for-profit organizations on labor and employment matters on a pro bono basis.

Photo of Laura Fant Laura Fant

Laura Fant is a special employment law counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-administrative leader of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Practice Group. Her practice is dedicated to providing clients with practical solutions to common (and uncommon) employment concerns…

Laura Fant is a special employment law counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-administrative leader of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Practice Group. Her practice is dedicated to providing clients with practical solutions to common (and uncommon) employment concerns, with a focus on legal compliance, risk management and mitigation strategies, and workplace culture considerations.

Laura regularly counsels clients across numerous industries on a wide variety of employment matters involving recruitment and hiring, employee leave and reasonable accommodation issues, performance management, and termination of employment . She also advises on preparing, implementing and enforcing employment and separation agreements, employee handbooks and company policies, as well as provides training on topics including discrimination and harassment in the workplace. Laura is a frequent contributor to Proskauer’s Law and the Workplace blog and The Proskauer Brief podcast.

Photo of Arielle E. Kobetz Arielle E. Kobetz

Arielle E. Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Counseling & Training Group. Her practice focuses on providing clients with strategies and counseling related to a variety of workplace-related disputes, including employee terminations…

Arielle E. Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Counseling & Training Group. Her practice focuses on providing clients with strategies and counseling related to a variety of workplace-related disputes, including employee terminations and discipline, leave and accommodation requests, and general employee relations matters. She also counsels clients on developing, implementing and enforcing personnel policies and procedures and reviewing and revising employee handbooks under federal, state and local law.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Arielle served as a law clerk at the New York City Human Resources Administration, Employment Law Unit, where she worked on a variety of employment discrimination and internal employee disciplinary issues.