Earlier this month, Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy has signed into law “An Act Concerning Pregnant Women in the Workplace” (the “Act”), which enhances employment protections for pregnant employees and applicants under the state’s existing anti-discrimination law. The expanded protections amend the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (“CFEPA”) and will go into effect October 1, 2017.

The Act maintains most of the current employer obligations that CFEPA requires for pregnant employees, including prohibitions on, among other things, terminating employment due to pregnancy, refusing to provide reasonable leave for disability resulting from pregnancy, or refusing to reinstate an employee after leave for such a pregnancy-related disability unless the employer’s circumstances have otherwise so changed that it is no longer possible to do so.

However, once effective, the Act will now make it a discriminatory practice for Connecticut employers to:

  • limit, segregate, or classify an employee in a way that would deprive her of employment opportunities because of her pregnancy;
  • discriminate on the basis of an employee or applicant’s pregnancy in the terms or conditions of her employment;
  • fail to accommodate a current or prospective employee during her pregnancy, unless providing such accommodation would constitute an undue hardship on the employer;
  • deny employment opportunities to a pregnant employee or applicant if denial is due to a request for reasonable accommodation;
  • require a pregnant employee or applicant to accept a reasonable accommodation if one is not needed;
  • require a pregnant employee take a leave of absence where a different reasonable accommodation may exist that would allow the employee to continue to perform the essential functions of her position; and
  • retaliate against an employee based on her request for reasonable accommodation relating to pregnancy.

The Act further provides expansive new definitions for the terms “pregnancy,” “reasonable accommodation,” and “undue hardship” under CFEPA, as follows:

  • The traditional statutory definition of “pregnancy” is expanded to cover any condition related to pregnancy and childbirth, including but not limited to, lactation.  This definition is significantly broader than both the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act (which limits “pregnancy” to including related medical conditions, rather than all related conditions) and the prior CFEPA definition (which limited employer accommodation requirements to situations involving “disability” resulting from pregnancy rather than requests relating to healthy pregnancies or conditions that do not otherwise rise to the level of a disability).
  • “Reasonable accommodation” is defined to include, without limitation, such things as permission to sit while working, longer or more frequent breaks, intermittent rest, assistance with manual labor, restructuring of job duties, modified assignments and work schedules, temporary reassignments, time off after childbirth, and break time and facilities for expressing breast milk in the workplace.
  • “Undue hardship” is defined an action requiring significant difficulty or expense, considered in light of factors such as nature and cost, employer financial resources, employer business size, and the effect on expenses and resources of such an accommodation.

Finally, the Act also includes express notice requirements to which Connecticut employers must adhere. Specifically, employers must provide existing employees with written notice of employee rights under the Act within 120 days of the law going into effect, and must also provide notice (going forward) to all new employees upon hire, and to any employee who notifies the employer of a pregnancy within ten days of such notification.  Notice can be satisfied by displaying a poster containing all relevant information in both Spanish and English in a conspicuous location at the employer’s place of business.  It is anticipated that the CT Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities will issue a form posting for this purpose.

We will continue to monitor and report on any new developments with regard to this law.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Keisha-Ann Gray Keisha-Ann Gray

Keisha-Ann G. Gray is a distinguished first-chair trial lawyer and litigator with a proven track record of securing significant victories in federal and state courts, including jury trials, for organizations facing high-stakes, reputational-risk claims. She is a member of the Firm’s seven-person Executive…

Keisha-Ann G. Gray is a distinguished first-chair trial lawyer and litigator with a proven track record of securing significant victories in federal and state courts, including jury trials, for organizations facing high-stakes, reputational-risk claims. She is a member of the Firm’s seven-person Executive Committee, an award-winning partner in Proskauer’s Labor & Employment department, co-chair of the Workplace Investigations practice group, co-chair of the Employment Trial practice group, and a leader of the department’s DEI Compliance Group.

With over 25 years of experience, Keisha-Ann is the go-to advisor when navigating issues related to discrimination, harassment, and DEI risk prevention. Her “real talk” approach provides clients with practical, actionable business-related solutions to today’s most complex workplace challenges.

Before joining Proskauer, Keisha-Ann served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York and as a federal law clerk in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. The breadth of her experience and background in federal government coupled with her tenure in private practice as a Big Law partner and employment litigator gives her the unique ability to meaningfully connect with diverse groups. This quality enables her to advocate effectively both in and out of the courtroom for her clients. As a result, Keisha-Ann is also frequently called upon to conduct high-profile investigations.

Because of her unique and varied skill set, clients routinely engage Keisha-Ann to personally handle their most sensitive matters which, due to her involvement, often result in non-public, confidential resolutions – preciously the mandate of many of her clients. However, when litigation is unavoidable, her courtroom skills are widely recognized — so much so that the effectiveness of her cross-examinations has been reported in the press — a fact that underscores her formidable skill at trial.

Keisha-Ann enjoys giving back to the community and profession by serving on the Mayor’s Advisory Committee on the Judiciary and the Magistrate Judge Selection Panel for the Eastern District of New York. She also sits on the Board of the Federal Bar Council and the Eastern District Association. In addition, she co-chairs the Federal Bar Council’s Employment Litigation Committee and actively mentors junior attorneys.

Photo of Laura Fant Laura Fant

Laura Fant is a special employment law counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-administrative leader of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Practice Group. Her practice is dedicated to providing clients with practical solutions to common (and uncommon) employment concerns…

Laura Fant is a special employment law counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-administrative leader of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Practice Group. Her practice is dedicated to providing clients with practical solutions to common (and uncommon) employment concerns, with a focus on legal compliance, risk management and mitigation strategies, and workplace culture considerations.

Laura regularly counsels clients across numerous industries on a wide variety of employment matters involving recruitment and hiring, employee leave and reasonable accommodation issues, performance management, and termination of employment . She also advises on preparing, implementing and enforcing employment and separation agreements, employee handbooks and company policies, as well as provides training on topics including discrimination and harassment in the workplace. Laura is a frequent contributor to Proskauer’s Law and the Workplace blog and The Proskauer Brief podcast.