Florida employers should take note of new developments regarding marijuana use.

First, a recent circuit court decision (which is now on appeal) held that the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA) requires employers to consider reasonable accommodations for off-duty medical marijuana use. In Giambrone v. Hillsborough County (Fla. 13th Cir. Ct. Dec. 10, 2024), the employee who worked for Hillsborough County as an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) tested positive for marijuana following a random drug test.  In accordance with an applicable collective bargaining agreement and the County’s Drug Free Workplace policy, the employee presented his employer and the testing doctor with a valid medical marijuana card. The County nevertheless placed the employee on administrative leave without pay. It admitted in court proceedings, however, that there had been no allegations that the employee used marijuana during work hours or that his job performance was impacted by his off-duty marijuana use.

The employee sued the County, alleging a failure to accommodate in violation of the FCRA as well as wrongful termination and breach of contract for failure to accept his state-issued medical marijuana card.  Analyzing the relevant provisions of the Florida Constitution and Florida statutes legalizing medical marijuana, the court found that while the plain language of the law does not require accommodation for on-siteuse, it does require employers to accommodate the qualified patient’s off-site use of medical marijuana. Here, there was no factual dispute as to whether the employee met the definition of a qualified patient, as he suffers from anxiety, PTSD, and insomnia which “substantially limits one or more of his major life activities on a daily basis when he is not properly medicated”. Therefore, the court concluded that the employee was protected under the FCRA and the County violated the law by failing to make a reasonable accommodation. The court was unpersuaded by the County’s argument that marijuana remains illegal under federal law, specifically finding it significant that the employee’s EMT license was supervised by Florida state law and that, under the collective bargaining agreement, the employee was entitled to report the use of prescription medications authorized under federal or state law to explain positive drug test results.

As noted above, the County has appealed this decision to Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal; however, employers should proceed with caution in assessing adverse action against a medical marijuana user.

Second, on the heels of this decision, a bill was introduced in the Florida Legislature that would require public employers to consider reasonable accommodations for medical marijuana users, and there is a renewed effort to approve a 2026 voter initiative to legalize recreational marijuana for adults. While a similar measure failed to garner sufficient support in the November 2024 general election, the new initiative includes several updates to address prior criticisms, including making clear that smoking and vaping in any public place would be prohibited. 

In light of these marijuana related developments, including employee marijuana use protections, Florida employers should consider reviewing their drug-free workplace policies and procedures.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jurate Schwartz Jurate Schwartz

Jurate Schwartz is a senior counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department. She devotes her practice to counseling clients in employment matters, as well as representing employers in federal and state litigations, arbitrations and administrative proceedings.

Jurate’s practice includes providing advice on…

Jurate Schwartz is a senior counsel in the Labor & Employment Law Department. She devotes her practice to counseling clients in employment matters, as well as representing employers in federal and state litigations, arbitrations and administrative proceedings.

Jurate’s practice includes providing advice on compliance with various laws affecting the workplace, including the FMLA, ADEA, Title VII, ADA, FLSA and similar state and local laws. She counsels clients on developing, implementing and enforcing personnel policies and procedures and reviewing and revising multi-state employee handbooks under federal, state and local laws. Jurate also advises clients on policy and training issues, including discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour, employee classification, accomodation of religious beliefs, pregnancy and disability, and leaves of absence, including vacation and paid time off policies, multi-state paid sick and safe leave laws and paid family and medical leave laws. Jurate is experienced in conducting wage-and-hour audits under federal and state wage-hour laws and advising clients on classification issues. She also assists clients in drafting employment, independent contractor, consulting and separation agreements as well as various restrictive covenants.

In addition to counseling, Jurate litigates employment disputes of all types, including claims of employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, whistleblowing, breach of contract, employment-related torts and claims under federal and state wage-and-hour laws. Jurate also assists clients in matters involving trade secrets and non-competes, as well as nonsolicitation, nondisclosure agreements and other restrictive covenants.

Jurate has been ranked by Chambers USA in Florida since 2012. One client comments, “I am a client with extremely high expectations and Proskauer never ceases to exceed them. Jurate has a perfectionist personality and that fits well with how we operate.”

Jurate’s pro bono work includes service on the HR committee of a not-for-profit organization, the YMCA of South Palm Beach County, Florida, and assisting other not-for-profit organizations with employment matters, as well as her successful representation of an unaccompanied immigrant child in an asylum proceeding referred by the National Center for Refugee & Immigrant Children.

Photo of Guy Brenner Guy Brenner

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member…

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member of the Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition Group. He has extensive experience representing employers in both single-plaintiff and class action matters, as well as in arbitration proceedings. He also regularly assists federal government contractors with the many special employment-related compliance challenges they face.

Guy represents employers in all aspects of employment and labor litigation and counseling, with an emphasis on non-compete and trade secrets issues, medical and disability leave matters, employee/independent contractor classification issues, and the investigation and litigation of whistleblower claims. He assists employers in negotiating and drafting executive agreements and employee mobility agreements, including non-competition, non-solicit and non-disclosure agreements, and also conducts and supervises internal investigations. He also regularly advises clients on pay equity matters, including privileged pay equity analyses.

Guy advises federal government contractors and subcontractors all aspects of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) regulations and requirements, including preparing affirmative action plans, responding to desk audits, and managing on-site audits.

Guy is a former clerk to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court of the District of Columbia.

Photo of Arielle E. Kobetz Arielle E. Kobetz

Arielle E. Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Counseling & Training Group. Her practice focuses on providing clients with strategies and counseling related to a variety of workplace-related disputes, including employee terminations…

Arielle E. Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Counseling & Training Group. Her practice focuses on providing clients with strategies and counseling related to a variety of workplace-related disputes, including employee terminations and discipline, leave and accommodation requests, and general employee relations matters. She also counsels clients on developing, implementing and enforcing personnel policies and procedures and reviewing and revising employee handbooks under federal, state and local law.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Arielle served as a law clerk at the New York City Human Resources Administration, Employment Law Unit, where she worked on a variety of employment discrimination and internal employee disciplinary issues.

Photo of Jake Lee Jake Lee

Jake Lee attended the Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, where he was an Issue Editor for the Louisiana Law Review. During law school, Jake served as an extern to the Honorable John W. deGravelles at the United States District Court…

Jake Lee attended the Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, where he was an Issue Editor for the Louisiana Law Review. During law school, Jake served as an extern to the Honorable John W. deGravelles at the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. Prior to attending law school, Jake attended the University of Georgia.