Quick Hit: Two new laws in Virginia providing disability discrimination protections and protections for medicinal use of cannabis oil for employees go into effect July 1, 2021.

Key Takeaway: Virginia, once known as a jurisdiction with very few state employment laws, is quickly changing that reputation with the passage of numerous new laws since the Democrats took control of the state legislature in 2019.  Employers operating in the Commonwealth, who in the past could largely focus solely on federal employment laws, must be aware of these new state laws and ensure they are in compliance.

More Detail:

Expansion of Disability Discrimination Protections and Accommodation Requirements

HB 1848 amends the Virginia Human Rights Act (“VHRA”) to provide additional employment protections to individuals with disabilities.  In addition to aligning existing disability discrimination protections to those of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) by prohibiting discrimination against those who are qualified to perform the “essential functions of a job with or without reasonable accommodation,” the law creates new reasonable accommodation requirements.  Similar to those provided for by the ADA, the new law will require employers to provide reasonable accommodations necessary to assist otherwise qualified persons with a disability to perform their job.  Employers are required to engage in a good faith interactive process when an employee requests a reasonable accommodation “to determine if the requested accommodation is reasonable and, if such accommodation is determined not to be reasonable, discuss alternative accommodations that may be provided.”

Like the ADA, the law contains an “undue burden” exception for the obligation to provide reasonable accommodations.  To avail itself of the exception, the employer must demonstrate the accommodation would impose undue hardship on the employer, assessed by considerations such as:

  1. Hardship on the conduct of the employer’s business, considering the nature of the employer’s operation, including composition and structure of the employer’s workforce.
  2. Size of the facility where employment occurs.
  3. The nature and cost of the accommodations needed, taking into account alternative sources of funding or technical assistance.
  4. The possibility that the same accommodations may be used by other prospective employees.
  5. Safety and health considerations of the person with a disability, other employees, and the public.

Employers cannot take adverse action against an employee because they request or use reasonable accommodations, or refuse employment to applicants because the employer will be required to provide them a reasonable accommodation.  Employers are also barred from requiring an employee take leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided.

Virginia employers should also note that the new law requires employers to include information on employees’ rights to reasonable accommodations for disabilities in their employee handbook and post the same in a “conspicuous” place at the location of employment.  In addition, such information has to be provided directly to employees at the commencement of their employment and within 10 days of the employee providing notice to the employer that the employee has a disability.

New Protections for Employees Who Use Cannabis Oil for Medicinal Purposes

HB 1862 prohibits employers from discharging, disciplining, or discriminating against an employee for their “lawful use of cannabis oil pursuant to a valid written certification issued by a practitioner for the treatment or to eliminate symptoms of the employee’s diagnosed condition or disease.”

“Cannabis oil” under the law is “any formulation of processed cannabis plant extract, which may include oil from industrial hemp extract acquired by a pharmaceutical processor pursuant to state law; or a dilution of the resin of the cannabis plant that contains at least five milligrams of cannabidiol (CBD) or tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THC-A) and no more than 10 milligrams of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) per dose.”

The law makes clear it does not (i) restrict an employer’s ability to take any adverse employment action for any work impairment or to prohibit possession during work hours, (ii) require an employer to commit any act that would cause the employer to be in violation of federal law or that would result in the loss of a federal contract or federal funding.

As noted above these laws are set to take effect July 1, 2021.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Guy Brenner Guy Brenner

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member…

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member of the Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition Group. He has extensive experience representing employers in both single-plaintiff and class action matters, as well as in arbitration proceedings. He also regularly assists federal government contractors with the many special employment-related compliance challenges they face.

Guy represents employers in all aspects of employment and labor litigation and counseling, with an emphasis on non-compete and trade secrets issues, medical and disability leave matters, employee/independent contractor classification issues, and the investigation and litigation of whistleblower claims. He assists employers in negotiating and drafting executive agreements and employee mobility agreements, including non-competition, non-solicit and non-disclosure agreements, and also conducts and supervises internal investigations. He also regularly advises clients on pay equity matters, including privileged pay equity analyses.

Guy advises federal government contractors and subcontractors all aspects of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) regulations and requirements, including preparing affirmative action plans, responding to desk audits, and managing on-site audits.

Guy is a former clerk to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court of the District of Columbia.

Photo of Shanice Z. Smith-Banks Shanice Z. Smith-Banks

Shanice is an associate in the Labor and Employment Law Department. Her practice involves litigating claims of unlawful discrimination, harassment, retaliation and whistleblowing. Shanice assists in conducting workplace investigations related to discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. She also counsels clients from a variety of…

Shanice is an associate in the Labor and Employment Law Department. Her practice involves litigating claims of unlawful discrimination, harassment, retaliation and whistleblowing. Shanice assists in conducting workplace investigations related to discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. She also counsels clients from a variety of fields on a range of employment matters.

Shanice earned her J.D. from Loyola University New Orleans College of Law, where she was a Managing Editor of the Loyola University Journal of Public Interest Law and a member of the Trial Advocacy program. Immediately upon graduation from Loyola, Shanice argued a case on behalf of the Loyola Criminal Defense Law Clinic in front of the Louisiana Supreme Court.