Unless you’ve been under a rock, the fact that many start-ups have recently found themselves on the wrong side of the litigation or threatened litigation “v.” should not surprise you. In fact, it is often the very things that make start-ups so appealing – their laid back culture, open floor plans, no dress code, lack of defined titles – that can create some of their worst HR nightmares.  With this in mind, here are my top five proactive tips for keeping your start-up out of trouble:

1. Harassment and Discrimination Training:  Routine training managers and other supervisors on how to respond to and act in certain situations can save start-ups from unnecessary litigation. Through training, start-ups can ensure that decision-makers prohibit workplace harassment and discrimination and shield against a hostile environment on the basis of any protected characteristic.

2. Create and Maintain an Employee Handbook:  All employers, regardless of size, should have an employee handbook to help ensure that employees receive important information about company guidelines, procedures and benefits.  A well-written employee handbook can set expectations with regard to performance and conduct, address routine employee questions and satisfy various legal and regulatory requirements by communicating certain information to employees.

3. Institute a Complaint Policy:  A complaint policy should include a detailed procedure through which employees may report an incident of harassment, discrimination or retaliation.  Employees who believe they have experienced harassing or discriminatory conduct should be encouraged to file a complaint before the conduct becomes severe or pervasive.  Employers should document all oral complaints or reports in writing.  After a complaint is made, employers should complete a prompt and thorough investigation.

4. Avoiding Wage and Hour Violations:  Wage and hour violations typically result from improper classifications of employees who have either been misclassified as exempt or as independent contractors.  Certain employees are “exempt” from overtime but exemptions are narrowly construed, and failure to properly classify status may lead to expensive claims. It is also critical to correctly determine whether individuals providing services are employees or independent contractors because independent contractors are not covered employees by the FLSA.

5.  Documentation and Recordkeeping:  Any event that is not documented did not happen.  As such, documentation is important to limit exposure to workplace litigation.  Employers should document all employment decisions and such documentation should:  (1) occur as close in time to the incident as possible; (2) show that the employer had a legitimate, non-discriminatory business reason for a possibly adverse action; and (3) put the individual on notice of any performance or disciplinary issues and provide the individual an opportunity to correct his/her performance or avoid future policy violations.

Originally published by the SHRMBlog, republished with permission.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Keisha-Ann Gray Keisha-Ann Gray

Keisha-Ann G. Gray is a distinguished first-chair trial lawyer and litigator with a proven track record of securing significant victories in federal and state courts, including jury trials, for organizations facing high-stakes, reputational-risk claims. She is a member of the Firm’s seven-person Executive…

Keisha-Ann G. Gray is a distinguished first-chair trial lawyer and litigator with a proven track record of securing significant victories in federal and state courts, including jury trials, for organizations facing high-stakes, reputational-risk claims. She is a member of the Firm’s seven-person Executive Committee, an award-winning partner in Proskauer’s Labor & Employment department, co-chair of the Workplace Investigations practice group, co-chair of the Employment Trial practice group, and a leader of the department’s DEI Compliance Group.

With over 25 years of experience, Keisha-Ann is the go-to advisor when navigating issues related to discrimination, harassment, and DEI risk prevention. Her “real talk” approach provides clients with practical, actionable business-related solutions to today’s most complex workplace challenges.

Before joining Proskauer, Keisha-Ann served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York and as a federal law clerk in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. The breadth of her experience and background in federal government coupled with her tenure in private practice as a Big Law partner and employment litigator gives her the unique ability to meaningfully connect with diverse groups. This quality enables her to advocate effectively both in and out of the courtroom for her clients. As a result, Keisha-Ann is also frequently called upon to conduct high-profile investigations.

Because of her unique and varied skill set, clients routinely engage Keisha-Ann to personally handle their most sensitive matters which, due to her involvement, often result in non-public, confidential resolutions – preciously the mandate of many of her clients. However, when litigation is unavoidable, her courtroom skills are widely recognized — so much so that the effectiveness of her cross-examinations has been reported in the press — a fact that underscores her formidable skill at trial.

Keisha-Ann enjoys giving back to the community and profession by serving on the Mayor’s Advisory Committee on the Judiciary and the Magistrate Judge Selection Panel for the Eastern District of New York. She also sits on the Board of the Federal Bar Council and the Eastern District Association. In addition, she co-chairs the Federal Bar Council’s Employment Litigation Committee and actively mentors junior attorneys.