In the nearly four years since Joe Biden was sworn in as President in 2021, groundbreaking advances in artificial intelligence (AI) became widely available that offer the potential to revolutionize employment-related decisions and processes for recruiting, hiring, promotions, and employee evaluation.  As the nation prepares for a second Trump Administration, and employers increasingly interested in adopting and using AI tools, one question on employers’ minds is what can they expect with respect to federal regulation of AI? 

The Biden Administration took a measured but deliberate approach to regulating AI in general and with respect to employment applications in particular, primarily by issuing non-binding guidance and articulating enforcement priorities with respect to laws already on the books, such as Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act.  The lynchpin of this approach was an October 2023 Executive Order (Executive Order) that outlined the administration’s “comprehensive strategy for responsible innovation.”  As relevant to employers and developers of AI tools for employers, that strategy included developing “principles and best practices to mitigate the harms and maximize the benefits of AI for workers,” and “directing agencies to combat algorithmic discrimination.”

Although it is difficult to predict precisely what the incoming Trump Administration will do in this space, there is an expectation it will unwind these efforts.  The Republican Party platform promised to repeal the Executive Order, which it called “dangerous” because it “hinders AI Innovation and imposes Radical Leftwing ideas on the development of this technology.”  The platform also expressed support for “AI Development rooted in Free Speech and Human Flourishing,” suggesting a more laissez-faire approach to AI regulation.  With Republicans also winning control of the Senate and the House of Representatives, federal legislation regulating employer’s use of AI tools appears unlikely.

If the Trump Administration takes a hands-off approach as expected, regulation of AI employment tools will likely continue (or even accelerate) at the state and local levels.  Colorado, New York City, and Illinois have already passed legislation in recent years regulating the use of AI in employment decisions.  The main features of these laws include disclosures about AI use (both to the public and to affected individuals) and audit requirements for automated decisionmaking tools aimed at identifying and mitigating algorithmic bias.  Similar laws have been introduced in other state legislatures, and they may proliferate if it becomes clear that comprehensive federal regulations are not forthcoming and as lawmakers become more educated on AI issues.

We will monitor how the legal landscape evolves under the new Administration and continue to report on AI developments that affect employers.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Guy Brenner Guy Brenner

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member…

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and leads the Firm’s Washington, D.C. Labor & Employment practice. He is head of the Government Contractor Compliance Group, co-head of the Counseling, Training & Pay Equity Group and a member of the Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets & Unfair Competition Group. He has extensive experience representing employers in both single-plaintiff and class action matters, as well as in arbitration proceedings. He also regularly assists federal government contractors with the many special employment-related compliance challenges they face.

Guy represents employers in all aspects of employment and labor litigation and counseling, with an emphasis on non-compete and trade secrets issues, medical and disability leave matters, employee/independent contractor classification issues, and the investigation and litigation of whistleblower claims. He assists employers in negotiating and drafting executive agreements and employee mobility agreements, including non-competition, non-solicit and non-disclosure agreements, and also conducts and supervises internal investigations. He also regularly advises clients on pay equity matters, including privileged pay equity analyses.

Guy advises federal government contractors and subcontractors all aspects of Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) regulations and requirements, including preparing affirmative action plans, responding to desk audits, and managing on-site audits.

Guy is a former clerk to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court of the District of Columbia.

Photo of Jonathan Slowik Jonathan Slowik

Jonathan Slowik is a special counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Counseling Group.