Employees in Oregon have greater protections against workplace harassment thanks to the recently-passed Workplace Protection Act (the “Act”), which would prohibit requiring nondisclosure agreements for employees or applicants that prohibits them from revealing sexual assault, harassment or discrimination. The new law also requires employers to implement a written anti-harassment policy and it extends the statute of limitations for filing complaints of harassment from one year to five years.

Nondisclosure Agreements

Under the new law, it will be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to enter into an agreement with an employee or prospective employee, as a condition of employment, continued employment, promotion, compensation or the receipt of benefits, that contains a nondisclosure provision, a nondisparagement provision, or any other provision that has the “purpose or effect of preventing the employee from disclosing or discussing conduct” related to discrimination and harassment on the basis of any protected category under state law, including sex, race, religion, national origin, age, and sexual orientation.

Employers may, however, enter into such agreements if it is the complainant’s preference and the complainant is provided at least 7 days to revoke the agreement after signing.  Notably, the Act also provides that, if after a good faith investigation, an employer has determined that someone with hiring and firing authority (or the discretion to exercise control over employees) committed harassment or discrimination, it may void a previously agreed upon contractual severance or separation provision, provided that such violations were a substantial contributing factor in causing separation from employment.

Policy Requirements

All employers must also adopt a written policy preventing discrimination and harassment in the workplace, provided that such policies meet certain minimum standards. Such policies must address the following:

  • Provide a process for an employee to report prohibited conduct;
  • Identify the individual designated by the employer who is responsible for receiving reports of prohibited conduct, including an individual designated as an alternate to receive such reports;
  • Include the statute of limitations period applicable to an employee’s right of action for alleging unlawful conduct;
  • Include a statement that an employer may not require or coerce an employee to enter into a nondisclosure or nondisparagement agreement, including a description of the meaning of those terms;
  • Include an explanation that an employee may voluntarily request to enter into a nondisclosure or nondisparagement agreement, including a statement that explains that the employee has at least 7 days to revoke the agreement; and
  • Include a statement that advises employers and employees to document any incidents involving discrimination and harassment.

The policy must be provided to all current employees and to all new employees upon hire.  Any individual who is designated by the employer to receive complaints must also provide a copy of the policy to an employee at the time such employee discloses information regarding discrimination or harassment. The state’s Bureau of Labor and Industries will make available model procedures or policies that employers may use as guidelines.

While the law will generally take effect 91 days after the Legislative Assembly adjourns (anticipated to be on June 30, 2019), the limitations on nondisclosure and nondisparagement agreements will take effect on October 1, 2020. In the interim, employers in Oregon should begin taking steps to ensure compliance by revising their existing agreements and policies to comply with the new law.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Arielle E. Kobetz Arielle E. Kobetz

Arielle E. Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Counseling & Training Group. Her practice focuses on providing clients with strategies and counseling related to a variety of workplace-related disputes, including employee terminations…

Arielle E. Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and a member of the Employment Counseling & Training Group. Her practice focuses on providing clients with strategies and counseling related to a variety of workplace-related disputes, including employee terminations and discipline, leave and accommodation requests, and general employee relations matters. She also counsels clients on developing, implementing and enforcing personnel policies and procedures and reviewing and revising employee handbooks under federal, state and local law.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Arielle served as a law clerk at the New York City Human Resources Administration, Employment Law Unit, where she worked on a variety of employment discrimination and internal employee disciplinary issues.

Photo of Evandro Gigante Evandro Gigante

Evandro Gigante is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration group and the Hiring & Terminations group. He represents and counsels clients through a variety of labor and employment matters, including allegations of…

Evandro Gigante is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration group and the Hiring & Terminations group. He represents and counsels clients through a variety of labor and employment matters, including allegations of race, gender, national origin, disability and religious discrimination, sexual harassment, wrongful discharge, defamation and breach of contract. Evandro also counsels employers through reductions-in-force and advises clients on restrictive covenant issues, such as confidentiality, non-compete and non-solicit agreements.

With a focus on discrimination and harassment matters, Evandro has extensive experience representing clients before federal and state courts. He has tried cases in court and before arbitrators and routinely represents clients before administrative agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, as well as state and local human rights commissions.